we%26#39;re planning a trip 1st-21st april flying into and out of sfo. (we can get a cheap return flight to las)
should we stay in SF for 2 weeks and vegas 1?
or vice versa? or split the 3 weeks equally?
any advice appreciated...thanx
san fran/vegas
I would stay 2 weeks in San Francisco and 1 week in Vegas. There is so much more to see and do in the bay area.Golden Gate bridge,Alcatraz Island,North beach,Muir Woods,Tiburon,Napa Valley,Carmel,Pebble Beach,Sonoma,Sausalito and so on.Las Vegas you have The casinos and Hoover Dam.
:))))
san fran/vegas
Unless you love gambling (and have a two week bankroll) or plan a side trip to the Grand Canyon, I think a week is plenty for Las Vegas.
Definately two weeks in SF. There is so much to do. I usually go to Vegas every few years bcs DH really like it. But we usually stay for three or four days only bcs I get tired of the glitzy hotels/casinos, shows, and buffets. I guess I not much into gambling.
thanx all. appreciate it.
I go to Vegas regularly. My husband likes to gamble and I love to shop! I find 5 nights to be longest I like to stay. The city is very fast-paced and a bit over the top, but I do love it! I find 4 nights/5 days to the perfect length of time, so with that being said, I agree with PPs that 1 week in Vegas would be good, especially if you check out Hoover Dam too. Spending the other 2 weeks in SF sounds like a good plan to me!
thanx all, think 2wks SF and 1wk vegas it is!
No comments:
Post a Comment